Incident 709: Unrepresented Litigant Misled by ChatGPT-Generated False Legal Citations in Manchester Court

Description: A litigant in person (LiP) in a Manchester civil case presented false legal citations generated by ChatGPT. It fabricated one case name and provided fictitious excerpts for three real cases, misleadingly supporting the LiP's argument. The judge, upon investigation, found the submissions to be inadvertent and did not penalize the LiP.

Tools

New ReportNew ReportNew ResponseNew ResponseDiscoverDiscoverView HistoryView History
Alleged: OpenAI developed an AI system deployed by Unnamed Manchester litigant, which harmed Unnamed Manchester litigant , Manchester court system and General public.

Incident Stats

Incident ID
709
Report Count
1
Incident Date
2023-05-28
Editors
Daniel Atherton
LiP presents false citations to court after asking ChatGPT
lawgazette.co.uk · 2023

A litigant in person tried to present fictitious submissions in court based on answers provided by the ChatGPT chatbot, the Gazette has learned. 

The civil case, heard in Manchester, involved one represented party and one unrepresented: pro…

Variants

A "variant" is an incident that shares the same causative factors, produces similar harms, and involves the same intelligent systems as a known AI incident. Rather than index variants as entirely separate incidents, we list variations of incidents under the first similar incident submitted to the database. Unlike other submission types to the incident database, variants are not required to have reporting in evidence external to the Incident Database. Learn more from the research paper.