Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Donate
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Spatial View
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Spatial View
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up

Welcome to the
AI Incident Database

Loading...
29 October 2026 Binance Security Incident: Initial Findings and Response Update

Incident 1817: Hackers Reportedly Used Internal AI Tool in $6.34 Billion Breach of Cryptocurrency Exchange Binance

“29 October 2026 Binance Security Incident: Initial Findings and Response Update”Latest Incident Report
binance.com2026-11-12

On 29 October 2026, Binance experienced a serious and highly sophisticated security incident. This should not have happened, and we apologise for the concern, disruption and uncertainty it caused our users, partners and the wider industry.

Our first responsibility is to protect users. Binance will absorb the financial impact of the stolen funds, not our users. We have already set aside more than 100% of the funds required to cover the loss. As of 31 October 2026, 98% of the impacted token assets have been replenished and are verifiable on our [Proof of Reserves](https://www.binance.com/en/pro

Read More
Loading...
Klaus Elmfelt Aerenlund v. OpenAI et al.: Complaint

Incident 1818: ChatGPT Allegedly Advised Danish Tenant to Withhold Rent and Reinforced False Business Claims Before His Eviction in Vordingborg, Denmark

“Klaus Elmfelt Aerenlund v. OpenAI et al.: Complaint”
clarksonlawfirm.com2026-11-12

AIID editor’s note: This report is abridged from a 38-page civil complaint. Excerpts reproduce selected numbered allegations concerning the tenant’s interactions with ChatGPT, rent-withholding advice, Danish eviction proceedings, alleged reinforcement of false beliefs, and claimed harms. The attorney/court caption, party and jurisdictional details, portions of contextual allegations, and the nine detailed legal counts and prayer for relief are omitted. Paragraph numbers are retained to show gaps; line wraps and PDF extraction artifacts were normalized. The source contains the plaintiff’s a

Read More
Loading...
Arrested by AI: Police ignore standards after facial recognition matches

Incident 1816: Kentucky Police Detective Allegedly Relied on False AI Facial Recognition Match, Leading to Nebraska Man's Arrest and Detention

“Arrested by AI: Police ignore standards after facial recognition matches”
washingtonpost.com2025-01-13

See the full Washington Post report for additional information, including an explanation of the methodology they employed.

PAGEDALE, Missouri — After two men brutally assaulted a security guard on a desolate train platform on the outskirts of St. Louis, county transit police detective Matthew Shute struggled to identify the culprits. He studied grainy surveillance videos, canvassed homeless shelters and repeatedly called the victim of the attack, who said he remembered almost nothing because of a brain injury from the beating.

Months later, they tried one more option.

Shute uploaded a sti

Read More
Loading...
BOSSAI: Inside the AI attack mesh that targeted Taiwan’s emergency services

Incident 1815: Attacker Reportedly Used BOSSAI AI Agents to Extract Emergency Dispatch Records in Taipei, Taiwan

“BOSSAI: Inside the AI attack mesh that targeted Taiwan’s emergency services”
acronis.com2026-11-12

Introduction

In recent weeks, the Acronis TRU team has identified and investigated an agentic, AI-driven campaign orchestrated by a lone operator based out of Taiwan, targeting hundreds of organizations in eleven countries and across several critical industries. While AI-assisted attacks are becoming common, this investigation provides an unusually detailed view of a multiagent, offensive infrastructure with all elements of its infrastructure laid bare for examination, all orchestrated in a single operational environment.

This individual built the kind of system many professionals strive

Read More
Loading...
Google faces claims student used AI chat on US school laptop to plan suicide attempt

Incident 1812: Google's Gemini Chatbot on a School-Issued Laptop Allegedly Helped a North Carolina Student Plan Suicide

“Google faces claims student used AI chat on US school laptop to plan suicide attempt”
reuters.com2026-11-08

Nov 5 (Reuters) - The parents of a girl in the US who used Google’s Gemini AI chatbot on her school-provided Chromebook to make a plan to die by suicide have sued the company, claiming it pushed its AI products on students and failed to warn of their dangers.

  • The girl, identified as “Emma,” began using Gemini on her Chromebook when she was 13

  • Emma discussed different methods of suicide with Gemini and planned a funeral for herself while the bot helped her conceal her feelings from her family, the lawsuit claims

  • Parents say they were alerted after school software flagged a document Emm

Read More
About the Database

The AI Incident Database is dedicated to indexing the collective history of harms or near harms realized in the real world by the deployment of artificial intelligence systems. Like similar databases in aviation and computer security, the AI Incident Database aims to learn from experience so we can prevent or mitigate bad outcomes.

You are invited to submit incident reports, whereupon submissions will be indexed and made discoverable to the world. Artificial intelligence will only be a benefit to people and society if we collectively record and learn from its failings. (Learn More)

post-image
AI Incident Roundup – August, September, and October 2026

By Daniel Atherton

2026-11-06

The Boulevard Montmartre at Night, Camille Pissarro, 1897 Patterns in This Batch Between the beginning of August and the end of October 2026...

Read More
The Database in Print

Read about the database at Time Magazine, Vice News, TechTalks, Wired, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Stanford AI Index, Rolling Stone, the Guardian, Harvard Business Review, Brasil em Folhas, Newsweek, and other outlets.

Arxiv LogoTechTalks LogoWired LogoVice logoNewsweek logoTime logoBulletin of the Atomic Scientists logoStanford HAI logoRolling Stone logoThe Guardian logoHarvard Business Review logoBrasil em Folhas logo
The Responsible AI Collaborative

The AI Incident Database is a project of the Responsible AI Collaborative, an organization chartered to advance the AI Incident Database. The governance of the Collaborative is architected around the participation in its impact programming. For more details, we invite you to read about our board and contributors.

The AIID depends on a great many mission-aligned organizations and people. We celebrate contributors to the dataset on the leaderboard. You can also see who is contributing to the codebase on GitHub.

View the Responsible AI Collaborative's Form 990 and tax-exempt application. We kindly request your financial support with a donation. All funds donated to the incident database improve incident coverage, quality of presentation, and depth of insight. We spend very little of our time and none of our budget on fundraising.

Organization Founding Sponsor
Database Founding Sponsor
Sponsors and Grants
In-Kind Sponsors
The AI Incident Briefing
An envelope with a neural net diagram on its left

Create an account to subscribe to new incident notifications and other updates.

Research

  • Defining an “AI Incident”
  • Defining an “AI Incident Response”
  • Database Roadmap
  • Related Work
  • Download Complete Database

Project and Community

  • About
  • Contact and Follow
  • Apps and Summaries
  • Editor’s Guide

Incidents

  • All Incidents in List Form
  • Flagged Incidents
  • Submission Queue
  • Classifications View
  • Taxonomies

2026 - AI Incident Database

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy