Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Donate
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Spatial View
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Spatial View
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse

Incident 1282: Reported Disqualification of Two Books from the Ockham New Zealand Book Awards Due to Alleged AI-Generated Cover Art

Description: Organizers of the Ockham New Zealand Book Awards reportedly disqualified two fiction books after it was reportedly determined their cover illustrations were produced using AI-assisted tools, rendering the works ineligible under newly introduced award criteria. The publisher reportedly confirmed AI involvement in the jacket designs. The authors were not implicated in the artwork decisions but were nonetheless removed from consideration for the 2026 running.

Tools

New ReportNew ReportNew ResponseNew ResponseDiscoverDiscoverView HistoryView History

Entities

View all entities
Alleged: Image generation technology developers developed an AI system deployed by Sugarcube Studios, which harmed Elizabeth Smither , Stephanie Johnson , Quentin Wilson Publishing , Ockham New Zealand Book Awards and Epistemic integrity.
Alleged implicated AI system: Image generation technology

Incident Stats

Incident ID
1282
Report Count
6
Incident Date
2025-11-17
Editors
Daniel Atherton
Applied Taxonomies
MIT

MIT Taxonomy Classifications

Machine-Classified
Taxonomy Details

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

6.3. Economic and cultural devaluation of human effort

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. Socioeconomic & Environmental Harms

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

Human

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Unintentional

Incident Reports

Reports Timeline

+1
Top writers ruled out of NZ book awards due to AI covers
+2
New Zealand book award disqualifies two authors for AI artwork
These Books Were Judged by Their A.I. Covers, and DisqualifiedHow two AI book covers forced the publishing industry to reckon with its future
Loading...
Top writers ruled out of NZ book awards due to AI covers

Top writers ruled out of NZ book awards due to AI covers

rnz.co.nz

Loading...
New Zealand book award disqualifies two authors for AI artwork

New Zealand book award disqualifies two authors for AI artwork

euronews.com

Loading...
Authors dumped from New Zealand’s top book prize after AI used in cover designs

Authors dumped from New Zealand’s top book prize after AI used in cover designs

theguardian.com

Loading...
New Zealand’s top book award disqualifies two prominent authors over AI artwork

New Zealand’s top book award disqualifies two prominent authors over AI artwork

the-independent.com

Loading...
These Books Were Judged by Their A.I. Covers, and Disqualified

These Books Were Judged by Their A.I. Covers, and Disqualified

nytimes.com

Loading...
How two AI book covers forced the publishing industry to reckon with its future

How two AI book covers forced the publishing industry to reckon with its future

thespinoff.co.nz

Loading...
Top writers ruled out of NZ book awards due to AI covers
rnz.co.nz · 2025

Two books by distinguished authors have been ruled out of New Zealand's premier literary prize because their covers were generated with artificial intelligence.

Elizabeth Smither's Angel Train and Stephanie Johnson's Obligate Carnivore, bot…

Loading...
New Zealand book award disqualifies two authors for AI artwork
euronews.com · 2025

The New Zealand Book Awards Trust introduced a new rule this year stating that any book submitted for the Ockham awards must not contain AI material of any kind.

"Don't judge a book by its cover" goes the famous idiom, one which may be toug…

Loading...
Authors dumped from New Zealand’s top book prize after AI used in cover designs
theguardian.com · 2025

The books of two award-winning New Zealand authors have been disqualified from consideration for the country’s top literature prize because artificial intelligence was used in the creation of their cover designs.

Stephanie Johnson’s collect…

Loading...
New Zealand’s top book award disqualifies two prominent authors over AI artwork
the-independent.com · 2025

Two of New Zealand's best-known writers have been disqualified from consideration for the country's premier literary prize after organisers discovered their book jackets used images generated with artificial intelligence.

Stephanie Johnson'…

Loading...
These Books Were Judged by Their A.I. Covers, and Disqualified
nytimes.com · 2025

One book cover shows a cat with green eyes baring humanlike teeth. Another has an angel soaring above a yellow freight train.

The authors of the books, which were submitted to one of New Zealand's largest literary competitions, didn't know …

Loading...
How two AI book covers forced the publishing industry to reckon with its future
thespinoff.co.nz · 2025

Elizabeth Smither and Stephanie Johnson's latest books, both published by Quentin Wilson Publishing, have been yeeted from the Ockhams.

Author Stephanie Johnson had no idea that the image of a cat with human teeth on the cover of her book o…

Variants

A "variant" is an AI incident similar to a known case—it has the same causes, harms, and AI system. Instead of listing it separately, we group it under the first reported incident. Unlike other incidents, variants do not need to have been reported outside the AIID. Learn more from the research paper.
Seen something similar?

Similar Incidents

By textual similarity

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Loading...
Defamation via AutoComplete

Defamation via AutoComplete

Apr 2011 · 27 reports
Loading...
Amazon Censors Gay Books

Amazon Censors Gay Books

May 2008 · 24 reports
Loading...
Wikipedia Vandalism Prevention Bot Loop

Wikipedia Vandalism Prevention Bot Loop

Feb 2017 · 6 reports
Previous IncidentNext Incident

Similar Incidents

By textual similarity

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Loading...
Defamation via AutoComplete

Defamation via AutoComplete

Apr 2011 · 27 reports
Loading...
Amazon Censors Gay Books

Amazon Censors Gay Books

May 2008 · 24 reports
Loading...
Wikipedia Vandalism Prevention Bot Loop

Wikipedia Vandalism Prevention Bot Loop

Feb 2017 · 6 reports

Research

  • Defining an “AI Incident”
  • Defining an “AI Incident Response”
  • Database Roadmap
  • Related Work
  • Download Complete Database

Project and Community

  • About
  • Contact and Follow
  • Apps and Summaries
  • Editor’s Guide

Incidents

  • All Incidents in List Form
  • Flagged Incidents
  • Submission Queue
  • Classifications View
  • Taxonomies

2026 - AI Incident Database

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • 35dcecc