Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Donate
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Spatial View
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Spatial View
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Entities

High Court of South Africa

Incidents Harmed By

Incident 17732 Report
South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

2026-01-29

Self-represented litigant Adriaan Johannes Roux relied on a nonexistent judgment in High Court submissions in Johannesburg, South Africa. The court attributed the false authority and unsound legal arguments to his admitted AI use and said addressing the material wasted court time and resources. The specific AI tools were not identified.

More

Related Entities
Other entities that are related to the same incident. For example, if the developer of an incident is this entity but the deployer is another entity, they are marked as related entities.
 

Entity

Pro se litigants

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

Adriaan Johannes Roux

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

Large language model developers

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

AI-assisted legal drafting system developers

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

Parties to legal proceedings

Incidents Harmed By
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

Judicial integrity

Incidents Harmed By
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg

Incidents Harmed By
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

Epistemic integrity

Incidents Harmed By
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

Courts

Incidents Harmed By
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

Large language models

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More
Entity

AI-assisted legal drafting systems

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1773
    2 Reports

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

More

Research

  • Defining an “AI Incident”
  • Defining an “AI Incident Response”
  • Database Roadmap
  • Related Work
  • Download Complete Database

Project and Community

  • About
  • Contact and Follow
  • Apps and Summaries
  • Editor’s Guide

Incidents

  • All Incidents in List Form
  • Flagged Incidents
  • Submission Queue
  • Classifications View
  • Taxonomies

2026 - AI Incident Database

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • b74f812