Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse
Discover
Submit
  • Welcome to the AIID
  • Discover Incidents
  • Spatial View
  • Table View
  • List view
  • Entities
  • Taxonomies
  • Submit Incident Reports
  • Submission Leaderboard
  • Blog
  • AI News Digest
  • Risk Checklists
  • Random Incident
  • Sign Up
Collapse

Report 166

Associated Incidents

Incident 1927 Report
Sexist and Racist Google Adsense Advertisements

Loading...
Latanya Sweeney, Racial Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery
sites.law.berkeley.edu · 2013

Latanya Sweeney, Racial Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery

Comment by: Margaret Hu

PLSC 2013

Published version available here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2208240

Workshop draft abstract:

Investigating the appearance of online advertisements that imply the existence of an arrest record, this writing chronicles field experiments that measure racial discrimination in ads served by Google AdSense. A specific company, instantcheckmate.com, sells aggregated public information about individuals in the United States and sponsors ads to appear with Google search results for searches of some exact “firstname lastname” queries. A Google search for a person’s name, such as “Trevon Jones”, may yield a personalized ad that may be neutral, such as “Looking for Trevon Jones? Comprehensive Background Report and More…”, or may be suggestive of an arrest record (Suggestive ad), such as “Trevon Jones, Arrested?…” or “Trevon Jones: Truth. Arrests and much more. … “

Field experiments documented in this writing show racial discrimination in ad delivery based on searches of 2200 personal names across two websites. First names, documented by others as being assigned primarily to black babies, such as Tyrone, Darnell, Ebony and Latisha, generated ads suggestive of an arrest 75 percent and 96 percent of the time, and names having a first name documented by others as being assigned at birth primarily to whites, such as Geoffrey, Brett, Kristen and Anne, generated more neutral copy: the word “arrest” appeared zero to 9 percent of the time. A few names did not follow these patterns: Brad, a name predominantly given to white babies, generated a Suggestive ad 62 percent to 65 percent of the time. All ads return results for actual individuals and Suggestive ads appear regardless of whether the subjects have an arrest record in the company’s database. Notwithstanding these findings, the company maintains Google received the same ad copy for groups of last names (not first names), raising questions as to whether Google’s algorithm exposes racial bias in society.

Read the Source

Research

  • Defining an “AI Incident”
  • Defining an “AI Incident Response”
  • Database Roadmap
  • Related Work
  • Download Complete Database

Project and Community

  • About
  • Contact and Follow
  • Apps and Summaries
  • Editor’s Guide

Incidents

  • All Incidents in List Form
  • Flagged Incidents
  • Submission Queue
  • Classifications View
  • Taxonomies

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • e1b50cd