Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Faire un don
Découvrir
Envoyer
  • Bienvenue sur AIID
  • Vue de tableau
  • Vue de liste
  • Entités
  • Taxonomies
  • Vue spatiale
  • Blog
  • Résumé de l’Actualité sur l’IA
  • Incident au hasard
  • S'inscrire
Découvrir
Envoyer
  • Bienvenue sur AIID
  • Vue de tableau
  • Vue de liste
  • Entités
  • Taxonomies
  • Vue spatiale
  • Blog
  • Résumé de l’Actualité sur l’IA
  • Incident au hasard
  • S'inscrire
Entités

AI-assisted legal drafting system developers

Incidents involved as Developer

Incident 17283 Rapports
Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

2026-09-22

Law firm Shapiro Arato Bach reportedly acknowledged that unchecked use of Harvey, a legal AI platform, produced a fictitious case citation and misattributed quotations in a brief filed in federal court in New York. The court required an explanation and disclosure of the AI tool. The judge declined sanctions, and the firm apologized and said it was adding safeguards.

Plus

Incident 17732 Rapports
South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

2026-01-29

Self-represented litigant Adriaan Johannes Roux relied on a nonexistent judgment in High Court submissions in Johannesburg, South Africa. The court attributed the false authority and unsound legal arguments to his admitted AI use and said addressing the material wasted court time and resources. The specific AI tools were not identified.

Plus

Entités liées
Autres entités liées au même incident. Par exemple, si le développeur d'un incident est cette entité mais que le responsable de la mise en œuvre est une autre entité, ils sont marqués comme entités liées.
 

Entity

Shapiro Arato Bach LLP

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

Plus
Entity

Lawyers

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

Plus
Entity

Law firms

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

Plus
Entity

Harvey

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

Plus
Entity

Large language model developers

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

Plus
Entity

Judicial integrity

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

Courts

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

Enterprise AI systems

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

Plus
Entity

AI-assisted legal drafting systems

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

Large language models

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1728
    3 Report

    Law Firm Shapiro Arato Bach Reportedly Filed Fictitious Case Citation and Misattributed Quotations Using Harvey's Legal AI Platform in New York Federal Court

  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

Pro se litigants

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

Adriaan Johannes Roux

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

Parties to legal proceedings

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

High Court of South Africa

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus
Entity

Epistemic integrity

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1773
    2 Report

    South African Court Found Self-Represented Litigant Relied on an AI-Hallucinated Judgment

Plus

Recherche

  • Définition d'un « incident d'IA »
  • Définir une « réponse aux incidents d'IA »
  • Feuille de route de la base de données
  • Travaux connexes
  • Télécharger la base de données complète

Projet et communauté

  • À propos de
  • Contacter et suivre
  • Applications et résumés
  • Guide de l'éditeur

Incidents

  • Tous les incidents sous forme de liste
  • Incidents signalés
  • File d'attente de soumission
  • Affichage des classifications
  • Taxonomies

2026 - AI Incident Database

  • Conditions d'utilisation
  • Politique de confidentialité
  • 97d184c