Incident 136: Les entreprises technologiques de sécurité des marques ont faussement revendiqué l'utilisation de l'IA, bloquant les publicités à l'aide de simples listes de mots-clés
Description: Les entreprises de technologie de sécurité des marques ont faussement prétendu utiliser l'IA, bloquant les publicités à l'aide de simples listes de mots-clés.
Entités
Voir toutes les entitésClassifications de taxonomie CSETv1
Détails de la taxonomieIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
136
Special Interest Intangible Harm
An assessment of whether a special interest intangible harm occurred. This assessment does not consider the context of the intangible harm, if an AI was involved, or if there is characterizable class or subgroup of harmed entities. It is also not assessing if an intangible harm occurred. It is only asking if a special interest intangible harm occurred.
no
Date of Incident Year
The year in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the year, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank.
Enter in the format of YYYY
2020
Date of Incident Month
The month in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the month, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank.
Enter in the format of MM
Estimated Date
“Yes” if the data was estimated. “No” otherwise.
Yes
Multiple AI Interaction
“Yes” if two or more independently operating AI systems were involved. “No” otherwise.
no
Risk Subdomain
A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
7.3. Lack of capability or robustness
Risk Domain
The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
- AI system safety, failures, and limitations
Entity
Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
AI
Timing
The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
Post-deployment
Intent
Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
Unintentional
Rapports d'incidents
Chronologie du rapport
Nous savons depuis longtemps que les technologies de détection de la sécurité des marques étaient des instruments émoussés [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Malgré leurs affirmations d'IA (intelligence artificielle) et de ML (apprentissage automatiq…
Variantes
Une "Variante" est un incident de l'IA similaire à un cas connu—il a les mêmes causes, les mêmes dommages et le même système intelligent. Plutôt que de l'énumérer séparément, nous l'incluons sous le premier incident signalé. Contrairement aux autres incidents, les variantes n'ont pas besoin d'avoir été signalées en dehors de la base de données des incidents. En savoir plus sur le document de recherche.
Vous avez vu quelque chose de similaire ?
Incidents similaires
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
Facebook’s Political Ad Detection Reportedly Showed High and Geographically Uneven Error Rates
· 5 rapports
Deepfake Obama Introduction of Deepfakes
· 29 rapports
Amazon Censors Gay Books
· 24 rapports
Incidents similaires
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
Facebook’s Political Ad Detection Reportedly Showed High and Geographically Uneven Error Rates
· 5 rapports
Deepfake Obama Introduction of Deepfakes
· 29 rapports
Amazon Censors Gay Books
· 24 rapports