Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar

Incidente 85: AI attempts to ease fear of robots, blurts out it can’t ‘avoid destroying humankind’

Descripción: On September 8, 2020, the Guardian published an op-ed generated by OpenAI’s GPT-3 text generating AI that included threats to destroy humankind. This incident has been downgraded to an issue as it does not meet current ingestion criteria.

Herramientas

Nuevo InformeNuevo InformeNueva RespuestaNueva RespuestaDescubrirDescubrirVer HistorialVer Historial

Entidades

Ver todas las entidades
Presunto: un sistema de IA desarrollado e implementado por OpenAI, perjudicó a unknown.

Estadísticas de incidentes

ID
85
Cantidad de informes
1
Fecha del Incidente
2020-10-09
Editores
Sean McGregor
Applied Taxonomies
CSETv0, CSETv1, MIT

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv0

Detalles de la Taxonomía

Problem Nature

Indicates which, if any, of the following types of AI failure describe the incident: "Specification," i.e. the system's behavior did not align with the true intentions of its designer, operator, etc; "Robustness," i.e. the system operated unsafely because of features or changes in its environment, or in the inputs the system received; "Assurance," i.e. the system could not be adequately monitored or controlled during operation.
 

Specification

Physical System

Where relevant, indicates whether the AI system(s) was embedded into or tightly associated with specific types of hardware.
 

Software only

Level of Autonomy

The degree to which the AI system(s) functions independently from human intervention. "High" means there is no human involved in the system action execution; "Medium" means the system generates a decision and a human oversees the resulting action; "low" means the system generates decision-support output and a human makes a decision and executes an action.
 

Medium

Nature of End User

"Expert" if users with special training or technical expertise were the ones meant to benefit from the AI system(s)’ operation; "Amateur" if the AI systems were primarily meant to benefit the general public or untrained users.
 

Amateur

Public Sector Deployment

"Yes" if the AI system(s) involved in the accident were being used by the public sector or for the administration of public goods (for example, public transportation). "No" if the system(s) were being used in the private sector or for commercial purposes (for example, a ride-sharing company), on the other.
 

No

Data Inputs

A brief description of the data that the AI system(s) used or were trained on.
 

Unlabeled text drawn from web scraping

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv1

Detalles de la Taxonomía

Incident Number

The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
 

85

Estimated Date

“Yes” if the data was estimated. “No” otherwise.
 

No

Lives Lost

Indicates the number of deaths reported
 

0

Injuries

Indicate the number of injuries reported.
 

0

Estimated Harm Quantities

Indicates if the amount was estimated.
 

No

There is a potentially identifiable specific entity that experienced the harm

A potentially identifiable specific entity that experienced the harm can be characterized or identified.
 

No

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía MIT

Machine-Classified
Detalles de la Taxonomía

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

7.3. Lack of capability or robustness

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. AI system safety, failures, and limitations

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

AI

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Pre-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Unintentional

Informes del Incidente

Cronología de Informes

Incident OccurrenceBase de datos de incidentes de AI Incidentes convertidos en problemas
Base de datos de incidentes de AI Incidentes convertidos en problemas

Base de datos de incidentes de AI Incidentes convertidos en problemas

github.com

Base de datos de incidentes de AI Incidentes convertidos en problemas
github.com · 2022
Traducido por IA

Los siguientes incidentes anteriores se han convertido a "problemas" luego de una actualización de definición de incidentes y criterios de ingestión.

21: Una prueba de Turing más dura expone la estupidez de los chatbots

Descripción: El Wino…

Variantes

Una "Variante" es un incidente que comparte los mismos factores causales, produce daños similares e involucra los mismos sistemas inteligentes que un incidente de IA conocido. En lugar de indexar las variantes como incidentes completamente separados, enumeramos las variaciones de los incidentes bajo el primer incidente similar enviado a la base de datos. A diferencia de otros tipos de envío a la base de datos de incidentes, no se requiere que las variantes tengan informes como evidencia externa a la base de datos de incidentes. Obtenga más información del trabajo de investigación.

Incidentes Similares

Por similitud de texto

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Philosophy AI Allegedly Used To Generate Mixture of Innocent and Harmful Reddit Posts

Someone let a GPT-3 bot loose on Reddit — it didn’t end well

Sep 2020 · 1 informe
Russian Chatbot Supports Stalin and Violence

Russian AI chatbot found supporting Stalin and violence two weeks after launch

Oct 2017 · 5 informes
TayBot

Danger, danger! 10 alarming examples of AI gone wild

Mar 2016 · 28 informes
Incidente AnteriorSiguiente Incidente

Incidentes Similares

Por similitud de texto

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Philosophy AI Allegedly Used To Generate Mixture of Innocent and Harmful Reddit Posts

Someone let a GPT-3 bot loose on Reddit — it didn’t end well

Sep 2020 · 1 informe
Russian Chatbot Supports Stalin and Violence

Russian AI chatbot found supporting Stalin and violence two weeks after launch

Oct 2017 · 5 informes
TayBot

Danger, danger! 10 alarming examples of AI gone wild

Mar 2016 · 28 informes

Investigación

  • Definición de un “Incidente de IA”
  • Definición de una “Respuesta a incidentes de IA”
  • Hoja de ruta de la base de datos
  • Trabajo relacionado
  • Descargar Base de Datos Completa

Proyecto y Comunidad

  • Acerca de
  • Contactar y Seguir
  • Aplicaciones y resúmenes
  • Guía del editor

Incidencias

  • Todos los incidentes en forma de lista
  • Incidentes marcados
  • Cola de envío
  • Vista de clasificaciones
  • Taxonomías

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • Condiciones de uso
  • Política de privacidad
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • ecd56df