Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar

Incidente 84: Tiny Changes Let False Claims About COVID-19, Voting Evade Facebook Fact Checks

Descripción: Avaaz, an international advocacy group, released a review of Facebook's misinformation identifying software showing that the labeling process failed to label 42% of false information posts, most surrounding COVID-19 and the 2020 USA Presidential Election.

Herramientas

Nuevo InformeNuevo InformeNueva RespuestaNueva RespuestaDescubrirDescubrirVer HistorialVer Historial

Entidades

Ver todas las entidades
Presunto: un sistema de IA desarrollado e implementado por Facebook, perjudicó a Facebook users , Facebook users interested in COVID information y Facebook users interested in the US Presidential Election.

Estadísticas de incidentes

ID
84
Cantidad de informes
1
Fecha del Incidente
2020-10-09
Editores
Sean McGregor, Khoa Lam
Applied Taxonomies
CSETv0, CSETv1, GMF, MIT

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv0

Detalles de la Taxonomía

Problem Nature

Indicates which, if any, of the following types of AI failure describe the incident: "Specification," i.e. the system's behavior did not align with the true intentions of its designer, operator, etc; "Robustness," i.e. the system operated unsafely because of features or changes in its environment, or in the inputs the system received; "Assurance," i.e. the system could not be adequately monitored or controlled during operation.
 

Robustness

Physical System

Where relevant, indicates whether the AI system(s) was embedded into or tightly associated with specific types of hardware.
 

Software only

Level of Autonomy

The degree to which the AI system(s) functions independently from human intervention. "High" means there is no human involved in the system action execution; "Medium" means the system generates a decision and a human oversees the resulting action; "low" means the system generates decision-support output and a human makes a decision and executes an action.
 

Medium

Nature of End User

"Expert" if users with special training or technical expertise were the ones meant to benefit from the AI system(s)’ operation; "Amateur" if the AI systems were primarily meant to benefit the general public or untrained users.
 

Amateur

Public Sector Deployment

"Yes" if the AI system(s) involved in the accident were being used by the public sector or for the administration of public goods (for example, public transportation). "No" if the system(s) were being used in the private sector or for commercial purposes (for example, a ride-sharing company), on the other.
 

No

Data Inputs

A brief description of the data that the AI system(s) used or were trained on.
 

User posts

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv1

Detalles de la Taxonomía

Incident Number

The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
 

84

AI Tangible Harm Level Notes

Notes about the AI tangible harm level assessment
 

3.3 - Although there was no tangible harm, the AI was linked to the adverse outcome described in the incident.

Notes (special interest intangible harm)

Input any notes that may help explain your answers.
 

AI failed to prevent the spread of misinformation

Special Interest Intangible Harm

An assessment of whether a special interest intangible harm occurred. This assessment does not consider the context of the intangible harm, if an AI was involved, or if there is characterizable class or subgroup of harmed entities. It is also not assessing if an intangible harm occurred. It is only asking if a special interest intangible harm occurred.
 

yes

Date of Incident Year

The year in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the year, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank. Enter in the format of YYYY
 

2019

Date of Incident Month

The month in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the month, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank. Enter in the format of MM
 

10

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía MIT

Machine-Classified
Detalles de la Taxonomía

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

7.3. Lack of capability or robustness

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. AI system safety, failures, and limitations

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

AI

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Unintentional

Informes del Incidente

Cronología de Informes

+1
Pequeños cambios permiten afirmaciones falsas sobre COVID-19, votaciones evaden verificaciones de datos de Facebook
Pequeños cambios permiten afirmaciones falsas sobre COVID-19, votaciones evaden verificaciones de datos de Facebook

Pequeños cambios permiten afirmaciones falsas sobre COVID-19, votaciones evaden verificaciones de datos de Facebook

npr.org

Pequeños cambios permiten afirmaciones falsas sobre COVID-19, votaciones evaden verificaciones de datos de Facebook
npr.org · 2020
Traducido por IA

Algo tan simple como cambiar la fuente de un mensaje o recortar una imagen puede ser todo lo que se necesita para eludir las defensas de Facebook contra engaños y mentiras.

Un nuevo análisis del grupo de defensa internacional Avaaz arroja l…

Variantes

Una "Variante" es un incidente que comparte los mismos factores causales, produce daños similares e involucra los mismos sistemas inteligentes que un incidente de IA conocido. En lugar de indexar las variantes como incidentes completamente separados, enumeramos las variaciones de los incidentes bajo el primer incidente similar enviado a la base de datos. A diferencia de otros tipos de envío a la base de datos de incidentes, no se requiere que las variantes tengan informes como evidencia externa a la base de datos de incidentes. Obtenga más información del trabajo de investigación.

Incidentes Similares

Por similitud de texto

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Wikipedia Vandalism Prevention Bot Loop

Danger, danger! 10 alarming examples of AI gone wild

Feb 2017 · 6 informes
Fake LinkedIn Profiles Created Using GAN Photos

That smiling LinkedIn profile face might be a computer-generated fake

Feb 2022 · 4 informes
Images of Black People Labeled as Gorillas

When It Comes to Gorillas, Google Photos Remains Blind

Jun 2015 · 24 informes
Incidente AnteriorSiguiente Incidente

Incidentes Similares

Por similitud de texto

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Wikipedia Vandalism Prevention Bot Loop

Danger, danger! 10 alarming examples of AI gone wild

Feb 2017 · 6 informes
Fake LinkedIn Profiles Created Using GAN Photos

That smiling LinkedIn profile face might be a computer-generated fake

Feb 2022 · 4 informes
Images of Black People Labeled as Gorillas

When It Comes to Gorillas, Google Photos Remains Blind

Jun 2015 · 24 informes

Investigación

  • Definición de un “Incidente de IA”
  • Definición de una “Respuesta a incidentes de IA”
  • Hoja de ruta de la base de datos
  • Trabajo relacionado
  • Descargar Base de Datos Completa

Proyecto y Comunidad

  • Acerca de
  • Contactar y Seguir
  • Aplicaciones y resúmenes
  • Guía del editor

Incidencias

  • Todos los incidentes en forma de lista
  • Incidentes marcados
  • Cola de envío
  • Vista de clasificaciones
  • Taxonomías

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • Condiciones de uso
  • Política de privacidad
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • ecd56df