Description: Avaaz, an international advocacy group, released a review of Facebook's misinformation identifying software showing that the labeling process failed to label 42% of false information posts, most surrounding COVID-19 and the 2020 USA Presidential Election.
Entidades
Ver todas las entidadesPresunto: un sistema de IA desarrollado e implementado por Facebook, perjudicó a Facebook users , Facebook users interested in COVID information y Facebook users interested in the US Presidential Election.
Estadísticas de incidentes
ID
84
Cantidad de informes
1
Fecha del Incidente
2020-10-09
Editores
Sean McGregor, Khoa Lam
Applied Taxonomies
Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv1
Detalles de la TaxonomíaIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
84
AI Tangible Harm Level Notes
Notes about the AI tangible harm level assessment
3.3 - Although there was no tangible harm, the AI was linked to the adverse outcome described in the incident.
Notes (special interest intangible harm)
Input any notes that may help explain your answers.
AI failed to prevent the spread of misinformation
Special Interest Intangible Harm
An assessment of whether a special interest intangible harm occurred. This assessment does not consider the context of the intangible harm, if an AI was involved, or if there is characterizable class or subgroup of harmed entities. It is also not assessing if an intangible harm occurred. It is only asking if a special interest intangible harm occurred.
yes
Date of Incident Year
The year in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the year, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank.
Enter in the format of YYYY
2019
Date of Incident Month
The month in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the month, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank.
Enter in the format of MM
10
Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv1_Annotator-1
Detalles de la TaxonomíaIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
84
AI Tangible Harm Level Notes
Notes about the AI tangible harm level assessment
3.3 - Although there was no tangible harm, the AI was linked to the adverse outcome described in the incident.
Special Interest Intangible Harm
An assessment of whether a special interest intangible harm occurred. This assessment does not consider the context of the intangible harm, if an AI was involved, or if there is characterizable class or subgroup of harmed entities. It is also not assessing if an intangible harm occurred. It is only asking if a special interest intangible harm occurred.
yes
Date of Incident Year
The year in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the year, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank.
Enter in the format of YYYY
2020
Estimated Date
“Yes” if the data was estimated. “No” otherwise.
Yes
Multiple AI Interaction
“Yes” if two or more independently operating AI systems were involved. “No” otherwise.
no
Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv0
Detalles de la TaxonomíaProblem Nature
Indicates which, if any, of the following types of AI failure describe the incident: "Specification," i.e. the system's behavior did not align with the true intentions of its designer, operator, etc; "Robustness," i.e. the system operated unsafely because of features or changes in its environment, or in the inputs the system received; "Assurance," i.e. the system could not be adequately monitored or controlled during operation.
Robustness
Physical System
Where relevant, indicates whether the AI system(s) was embedded into or tightly associated with specific types of hardware.
Software only
Level of Autonomy
The degree to which the AI system(s) functions independently from human intervention. "High" means there is no human involved in the system action execution; "Medium" means the system generates a decision and a human oversees the resulting action; "low" means the system generates decision-support output and a human makes a decision and executes an action.
Medium
Nature of End User
"Expert" if users with special training or technical expertise were the ones meant to benefit from the AI system(s)’ operation; "Amateur" if the AI systems were primarily meant to benefit the general public or untrained users.
Amateur
Public Sector Deployment
"Yes" if the AI system(s) involved in the accident were being used by the public sector or for the administration of public goods (for example, public transportation). "No" if the system(s) were being used in the private sector or for commercial purposes (for example, a ride-sharing company), on the other.
No
Data Inputs
A brief description of the data that the AI system(s) used or were trained on.
User posts
Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv1_Annotator-3
Detalles de la TaxonomíaIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
84
AI Tangible Harm Level Notes
Notes about the AI tangible harm level assessment
there wasn't necessarily a type of harm, just that the AI is failing to fulfill its purpose of completely and accurately filtering out misinformation
Notes (special interest intangible harm)
Input any notes that may help explain your answers.
AI failed to prevent the spread of misinformation
Special Interest Intangible Harm
An assessment of whether a special interest intangible harm occurred. This assessment does not consider the context of the intangible harm, if an AI was involved, or if there is characterizable class or subgroup of harmed entities. It is also not assessing if an intangible harm occurred. It is only asking if a special interest intangible harm occurred.
yes
Informes del Incidente
Cronología de Informes
npr.org · 2020
- Ver el informe original en su fuente
- Ver el informe en el Archivo de Internet
Algo tan simple como cambiar la fuente de un mensaje o recortar una imagen puede ser todo lo que se necesita para eludir las defensas de Facebook contra engaños y mentiras.
Un nuevo análisis del grupo de defensa internacional Avaaz arroja l…
Variantes
Una "Variante" es un incidente que comparte los mismos factores causales, produce daños similares e involucra los mismos sistemas inteligentes que un incidente de IA conocido. En lugar de indexar las variantes como incidentes completamente separados, enumeramos las variaciones de los incidentes bajo el primer incidente similar enviado a la base de datos. A diferencia de otros tipos de envío a la base de datos de incidentes, no se requiere que las variantes tengan informes como evidencia externa a la base de datos de incidentes. Obtenga más información del trabajo de investigación.
Incidentes Similares
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
Incidentes Similares
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents