Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar

Incidente 724: AI-Generated Papers Manipulate Scopus Rankings in Top Philosophy Journals

Descripción: Three reportedly fake journals published by Addleton Academic Publishers manipulated Scopus rankings by extensively cross-citing each other and using AI-generated papers filled with buzzwords. These journals, placed in the top 10 of Scopus's 2023 CiteScore philosophy list, featured fake authors, affiliations, and grant numbers. This manipulation pushed legitimate journals to lower tiers, affecting academic evaluations and awards.

Herramientas

Nuevo InformeNuevo InformeNueva RespuestaNueva RespuestaDescubrirDescubrirVer HistorialVer Historial

Entidades

Ver todas las entidades
Presunto: un sistema de IA desarrollado e implementado por Fake publications , Auricle Global Society of Education and Research y Addleton Academic Publishers, perjudicó a University hiring committees , University faculty , Scopus , Academic journals y University job candidates.

Estadísticas de incidentes

ID
724
Cantidad de informes
1
Fecha del Incidente
2024-06-12
Editores
Daniel Atherton
Applied Taxonomies
MIT

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía MIT

Machine-Classified
Detalles de la Taxonomía

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

3.1. False or misleading information

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. Misinformation

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

Human

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Intentional

Informes del Incidente

Cronología de Informes

+1
How a widely used ranking system ended up with three fake journals in its top 10 philosophy list
How a widely used ranking system ended up with three fake journals in its top 10 philosophy list

How a widely used ranking system ended up with three fake journals in its top 10 philosophy list

retractionwatch.com

How a widely used ranking system ended up with three fake journals in its top 10 philosophy list
retractionwatch.com · 2024

Recently our philosophy faculty at Jagiellonian University in Kraków, like many institutions around the world, introduced a ranking of journals based on Elsevier's Scopus database to evaluate the research output of its employees for awards …

Variantes

Una "Variante" es un incidente que comparte los mismos factores causales, produce daños similares e involucra los mismos sistemas inteligentes que un incidente de IA conocido. En lugar de indexar las variantes como incidentes completamente separados, enumeramos las variaciones de los incidentes bajo el primer incidente similar enviado a la base de datos. A diferencia de otros tipos de envío a la base de datos de incidentes, no se requiere que las variantes tengan informes como evidencia externa a la base de datos de incidentes. Obtenga más información del trabajo de investigación.

Incidentes Similares

Por similitud de texto

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Northpointe Risk Models

Machine Bias - ProPublica

May 2016 · 15 informes
High-Toxicity Assessed on Text Involving Women and Minority Groups

Google’s comment-ranking system will be a hit with the alt-right

Feb 2017 · 9 informes
Gender Biases in Google Translate

Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases

Apr 2017 · 10 informes
Incidente AnteriorSiguiente Incidente

Incidentes Similares

Por similitud de texto

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

Northpointe Risk Models

Machine Bias - ProPublica

May 2016 · 15 informes
High-Toxicity Assessed on Text Involving Women and Minority Groups

Google’s comment-ranking system will be a hit with the alt-right

Feb 2017 · 9 informes
Gender Biases in Google Translate

Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases

Apr 2017 · 10 informes

Investigación

  • Definición de un “Incidente de IA”
  • Definición de una “Respuesta a incidentes de IA”
  • Hoja de ruta de la base de datos
  • Trabajo relacionado
  • Descargar Base de Datos Completa

Proyecto y Comunidad

  • Acerca de
  • Contactar y Seguir
  • Aplicaciones y resúmenes
  • Guía del editor

Incidencias

  • Todos los incidentes en forma de lista
  • Incidentes marcados
  • Cola de envío
  • Vista de clasificaciones
  • Taxonomías

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • Condiciones de uso
  • Política de privacidad
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • ecd56df