概要: 公文書開示請求をめぐる法的紛争の後、ニューヨーク市教育局は、生徒のテストスコアの伸びを推定した上で、付加価値統計モデルを用いて数千人の公立学校教師を評価した教師データレポートを公表した。報道機関は2012年2月にこの評価を報じたが、教師、労働組合、アナリストらは、大きな誤差範囲、限られたサンプル、名簿との連携における明らかな誤りなどを理由に、この評価は不正確で誤解を招く可能性があるとして異議を唱えた。
CSETv1 分類法のクラス
分類法の詳細Incident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
9
AI Tangible Harm Level Notes
Notes about the AI tangible harm level assessment
3.5 - the value-added measurement/modeling is not AI - it is a statistical model
Special Interest Intangible Harm
An assessment of whether a special interest intangible harm occurred. This assessment does not consider the context of the intangible harm, if an AI was involved, or if there is characterizable class or subgroup of harmed entities. It is also not assessing if an intangible harm occurred. It is only asking if a special interest intangible harm occurred.
no
Date of Incident Year
The year in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the year, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank.
Enter in the format of YYYY
2012
Estimated Date