Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Découvrir
Envoyer
  • Bienvenue sur AIID
  • Découvrir les incidents
  • Vue spatiale
  • Vue de tableau
  • Vue de liste
  • Entités
  • Taxonomies
  • Soumettre des rapports d'incident
  • Classement des reporters
  • Blog
  • Résumé de l’Actualité sur l’IA
  • Contrôle des risques
  • Incident au hasard
  • S'inscrire
Fermer
Découvrir
Envoyer
  • Bienvenue sur AIID
  • Découvrir les incidents
  • Vue spatiale
  • Vue de tableau
  • Vue de liste
  • Entités
  • Taxonomies
  • Soumettre des rapports d'incident
  • Classement des reporters
  • Blog
  • Résumé de l’Actualité sur l’IA
  • Contrôle des risques
  • Incident au hasard
  • S'inscrire
Fermer
Entités

Legal integrity

Affecté par des incidents

Incident 11456 Rapports
MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

2025-02-25

In February 2025, lawyers Christopher I. Kachouroff and Jennifer T. DeMaster, representing Mike Lindell, reportedly used generative AI to draft a court brief that contained nearly 30 defective or fabricated citations. The error-filled filing violated federal court rules requiring factual and legal accuracy. The judge fined both lawyers $3,000 each, citing either the improper use of AI or gross carelessness as the cause of the misleading legal content.

Plus

Incident 11384 Rapports
South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

2023-03-01

In a defamation case at the Johannesburg Regional Court, Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys, representing plaintiff Michelle Parker, reportedly relied on purportedly non-existent legal judgments generated by ChatGPT to help argue their case. Magistrate Arvin Chaitram reportedly found the case names and citations were fictitious, causing a two-month delay. The court issued a punitive costs order and rebuked the plaintiff's legal team for uncritically accepting AI-generated research.

Plus

Incident 10992 Rapports
Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

2025-04-25

In Ko v. Li, 2025 ONSC 2766, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice identified multiple inaccurate or nonexistent case citations in a factum submitted by counsel for the applicant. Justice FL Myers questioned whether generative AI was used in drafting the document, noting the cited cases were either irrelevant, misrepresented, or did not exist. The court ordered the lawyer to show cause why she should not be cited for contempt, citing duties of accuracy and technological competence.

Plus

Incident 10271 Rapport
Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

2025-04-10

In early 2025, Norway’s Supreme Court (Høyesterett) received a legal filing containing hallucinated legal citations and quotes, allegedly inserted by an attorney using an AI tool without verification. The fabricated sources were detected during standard review. While no sanctions were issued, the Court updated its guidance to lawyers, warning that AI use does not exempt them from professional responsibility.

Plus

Entités liées
Autres entités liées au même incident. Par exemple, si le développeur d'un incident est cette entité mais que le responsable de la mise en œuvre est une autre entité, ils sont marqués comme entités liées.
 

Entity

Unnamed Norwegian lawyer

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Plus
Entity

Unspecified generative AI developer

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incident 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Plus
Entity

Supreme Court of Norway

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Plus
Entity

Høyesterett

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Plus
Entity

Unnamed clients represented by unnamed Norwegian lawyer

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Plus
Entity

Unnamed generative AI system

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Plus
Entity

Jisuh Lee

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Plus
Entity

Unspecified large language mode developer

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incident 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Plus
Entity

Hanna Ko

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Plus
Entity

Ontario Superior Court of Justice

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Plus
Entity

Unspecified large language model

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Plus
Entity

Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Plus
Entity

Jurie Hayes

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Plus
Entity

Chantal Rodrigues

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Plus
Entity

OpenAI

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Plus
Entity

Michelle Parker

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Plus
Entity

Judicial integrity

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Plus
Entity

Epistemic integrity

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Plus
Entity

ChatGPT

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1138
    4 Report

    South African Legal Team Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Plus
Entity

Jennifer T. DeMaster

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Plus
Entity

Christopher I. Kachouroff

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Plus
Entity

McSweeny Synkar and Kachouroff PLLC

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Plus
Entity

Unnamed large language model developer

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Plus
Entity

MyPillow

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Plus
Entity

Mike Lindell

Affecté par des incidents
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Plus
Entity

Unnamed large language model

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incident 1145
    6 Report

    MyPillow Defense Lawyers in Coomer v. Lindell Reportedly Sanctioned for Filing Court Document Allegedly Containing AI-Generated Legal Citations

Plus

Recherche

  • Définition d'un « incident d'IA »
  • Définir une « réponse aux incidents d'IA »
  • Feuille de route de la base de données
  • Travaux connexes
  • Télécharger la base de données complète

Projet et communauté

  • À propos de
  • Contacter et suivre
  • Applications et résumés
  • Guide de l'éditeur

Incidents

  • Tous les incidents sous forme de liste
  • Incidents signalés
  • File d'attente de soumission
  • Affichage des classifications
  • Taxonomies

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • Conditions d'utilisation
  • Politique de confidentialité
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • a9df9cf