Description: In 2019, facial recognition technology misidentified Francisco Arteaga as a suspect in an armed robbery in New Jersey. The incident led to nearly four years of pretrial incarceration. Despite having an alibi, Arteaga was charged based on the flawed identification. The legal battle that followed resulted in a court ruling requiring police to reveal details about the algorithms used in facial recognition. The process exposed significant gaps in transparency and accountability.
Editor Notes: See Incident 815 for a broader overview of these specific kinds of harms. Reconstructing the timeline of events: (1) November 29, 2019: An armed robbery occurs at the Buenavista Multiservices store in West New York, New Jersey. Police submit surveillance footage for facial recognition analysis. (2) December 2019: The West New York Police Department sends surveillance footage to the NYPD's Real Time Crime Center, which identifies Francisco Arteaga as a possible match using facial recognition technology. (3) 2019-2022: Arteaga spends nearly four years in pretrial detention while fighting the charges, despite having an alibi. (4) May 13, 2022: A trial judge denies Arteaga’s motion for discovery on details of the facial recognition technology used in his case. (5) June 7, 2023: A New Jersey appellate court rules that Arteaga is entitled to information on the facial recognition technology used in his case, including the algorithm, error rates, and other relevant details.
Entités
Voir toutes les entitésAlleged: Clearview AI developed an AI system deployed by West New York PD , NYPD et Real Time Crime Center, which harmed Francisco Arteaga.
Statistiques d'incidents
Risk Subdomain
A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
7.3. Lack of capability or robustness
Risk Domain
The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
- AI system safety, failures, and limitations
Entity
Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
Human
Timing
The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
Post-deployment
Intent
Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
Unintentional
Rapports d'incidents
Chronologie du rapport
Francisco Arteaga était incarcéré, en attente de comparaître devant un tribunal l’automne dernier, lorsqu’il a aperçu un énorme type qui le regardait de l’autre côté de la cellule de détention du palais de justice.
« Les bras de ce type son…
Variantes
Une "Variante" est un incident qui partage les mêmes facteurs de causalité, produit des dommages similaires et implique les mêmes systèmes intelligents qu'un incident d'IA connu. Plutôt que d'indexer les variantes comme des incidents entièrement distincts, nous listons les variations d'incidents sous le premier incident similaire soumis à la base de données. Contrairement aux autres types de soumission à la base de données des incidents, les variantes ne sont pas tenues d'avoir des rapports en preuve externes à la base de données des incidents. En savoir plus sur le document de recherche.
Incidents similaires
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
The man who was fired by a machine
· 20 rapports
When License-Plate Surveillance Goes Horribly Wrong
· 2 rapports
Wrongfully Accused by an Algorithm
· 11 rapports
Incidents similaires
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
The man who was fired by a machine
· 20 rapports
When License-Plate Surveillance Goes Horribly Wrong
· 2 rapports
Wrongfully Accused by an Algorithm
· 11 rapports