Description: In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the International Baccalaureate final exams were replaced by a calculated score, prompting complaints of unfairness from teachers and students.
Entités
Voir toutes les entitésPrésumé : Un système d'IA développé et mis en œuvre par International Baccalaurette, a endommagé International Baccalaureate students.
Classifications de taxonomie CSETv0
Détails de la taxonomieProblem Nature
Indicates which, if any, of the following types of AI failure describe the incident: "Specification," i.e. the system's behavior did not align with the true intentions of its designer, operator, etc; "Robustness," i.e. the system operated unsafely because of features or changes in its environment, or in the inputs the system received; "Assurance," i.e. the system could not be adequately monitored or controlled during operation.
Unknown/unclear
Physical System
Where relevant, indicates whether the AI system(s) was embedded into or tightly associated with specific types of hardware.
Software only
Level of Autonomy
The degree to which the AI system(s) functions independently from human intervention. "High" means there is no human involved in the system action execution; "Medium" means the system generates a decision and a human oversees the resulting action; "low" means the system generates decision-support output and a human makes a decision and executes an action.
Low
Nature of End User
"Expert" if users with special training or technical expertise were the ones meant to benefit from the AI system(s)’ operation; "Amateur" if the AI systems were primarily meant to benefit the general public or untrained users.
Expert
Public Sector Deployment
"Yes" if the AI system(s) involved in the accident were being used by the public sector or for the administration of public goods (for example, public transportation). "No" if the system(s) were being used in the private sector or for commercial purposes (for example, a ride-sharing company), on the other.
No
Data Inputs
A brief description of the data that the AI system(s) used or were trained on.
Prior test and exam grades, school attended
Classifications de taxonomie CSETv1
Détails de la taxonomieIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
78
AI Tangible Harm Level Notes
Notes about the AI tangible harm level assessment
The harm was caused by a statistical algorithm that did not meet our definition of AI. Harm did occur, but it was intangible (opportunity loss) instead of tangible.
Risk Subdomain
A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
7.3. Lack of capability or robustness
Risk Domain
The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
- AI system safety, failures, and limitations
Entity
Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
AI
Timing
The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
Post-deployment
Intent
Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
Unintentional
Rapports d'incidents
Chronologie du rapport
ANAHITA NAGPAL, 18 ANS, craint que son projet de commencer une formation cet automne pour devenir médecin ait été déjoué par un modèle statistique.
Nagpal, qui vit à Göttingen, en Allemagne, s'était vu offrir une place de préméditation et u…
Variantes
Une "Variante" est un incident qui partage les mêmes facteurs de causalité, produit des dommages similaires et implique les mêmes systèmes intelligents qu'un incident d'IA connu. Plutôt que d'indexer les variantes comme des incidents entièrement distincts, nous listons les variations d'incidents sous le premier incident similaire soumis à la base de données. Contrairement aux autres types de soumission à la base de données des incidents, les variantes ne sont pas tenues d'avoir des rapports en preuve externes à la base de données des incidents. En savoir plus sur le document de recherche.
Incidents similaires
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
Racist AI behaviour is not a new problem
· 4 rapports
Analyzing Released NYC Value-Added Data Part 2
· 7 rapports
Working Anything but 9 to 5
· 10 rapports
Incidents similaires
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
Racist AI behaviour is not a new problem
· 4 rapports
Analyzing Released NYC Value-Added Data Part 2
· 7 rapports
Working Anything but 9 to 5
· 10 rapports