Editor Notes: This incident ID is a collective incident representing several discrete harm events centering on investigations into Global Intelligence's Cybercheck AI tool, an incident ID that may form the basis for future individual incident IDs themselves. Quick notes on the individual incidents and their general timelines for later consideration: (1) In Akron, Ohio, on August 2, 2020, Kimberly Thompson, Brian James, and Thompson’s grandson, Tyree Halsell, were shot. Cybercheck evidence mistakenly placed suspect Phillip Mendoza at the scene on August 20, claiming 93.13% accuracy. A corrected report later appeared with the correct date, but questions arose over its accuracy. Mendoza’s defense challenged the evidence, and the Cybercheck report was ultimately withdrawn. Mendoza pleaded guilty in August 2023, receiving 15 to 20.5 years, though Cybercheck’s errors may have influenced the outcome. (2) From 2017-2021, Cybercheck expanded rapidly across U.S. law enforcement agencies, conducting thousands of searches, often without methodological validation. (3) In Midland County, Texas, 2021, Cybercheck linked suspect Sergio Cerna to a murder scene by claiming a 97.25% accuracy rate in his device's interaction with a wireless printer. Mid-hearing, the prosecution withdrew Cybercheck’s evidence due to a lack of corroboration, yet Cerna was later convicted on other grounds. (4) In July 2021, in Akron, Ohio, Cybercheck implicated Deshawn Coleman and Eric Farrey in a robbery. However, experts could not verify social media accounts or email addresses tied to the suspects. (5) In 2022, in Aurora, Colorado, Cybercheck identified a homicide suspect via a router ping, but detectives found the resident had no such router, nullifying the evidence. (6) In a separate Akron 2021 homicide, Cybercheck data against Javion Rankin was excluded after Adam Mosher withheld the source code, leading to Rankin’s release. (7) In another Aurora, Colorado case involving the 2022 shooting of a 13-year-old, Cybercheck posited a gang link between rival suspects, conflicting with other evidence and raising doubts. (8) Mississippi’s Bureau of Investigation, in 2022, used Cybercheck in a missing juvenile case but found the information false; the juvenile was found through traditional methods, reportedly wasting investigative resources. (9) In late 2022/early 2023, Summit County prosecutors withdrew Cybercheck evidence from four murder cases following defense challenges on reliability. (10) In a New York cold case, Cybercheck claimed to track a suspect’s phone to multiple crime locations from 20 years ago, with trial set for 2025. (11) In late 2022, Summit County murder cases for Salah Mahdi and Adarus Black involved Cybercheck, but no defense challenge was raised. Later, validation issues in other cases prompted post-conviction concerns. (12) In a 2023 Boulder, Colorado child sexual abuse case, Mosher’s reportedly misleading testimony about prior Canadian cases led to dropped charges and raised credibility questions. (13) In April 2023, Coleman and Farrey’s defense revealed inconsistencies in Mosher’s expert witness records, undermining the Cybercheck report. (14) Ohio’s Bureau of Criminal Investigation ended its $30,000 contract after Cybercheck provided unverifiable email leads in multiple cases. (15) Yakima County, Washington ceased using Cybercheck following numerous inaccuracies in the tool’s output. (16) Cybercheck’s reports included persistent issues with unverifiable device-network pings, casting doubts on the legitimacy of its claimed open-source accuracy.