Description: Body-worn camera footage released in litigation over Operation Midway Blitz reportedly showed that an immigration agent used ChatGPT to generate a long-form use-of-force narrative based on minimal inputs. A federal judge found that multiple AI-assisted reports conflicted with contemporaneous video evidence, undermining their accuracy and credibility and raising concerns about the use of generative AI in official law enforcement reporting.
Editor Notes: Timeline of reported events: (1) On 10/03/2025, body-camera footage reportedly shows a U.S. Border Patrol agent using ChatGPT on a mobile phone to generate a long-form narrative for an enforcement report during Operation Midway Blitz. (2) Subsequent review of this reported body-worn camera footage reveals discrepancies between AI-assisted reports and recorded events. (3) On 11/28/2025, the Chicago Tribune reports that U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis cites the ChatGPT use as undermining the credibility of agents' use-of-force reports in a preliminary injunction ruling.
Entités
Voir toutes les entitésAlleged: OpenAI developed an AI system deployed by United States Border Patrol , United States Department of Homeland Security , United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et Unnamed United States Border Patrol agent, which harmed Individuals detained during Operation Midway Blitz , Protesters and bystanders in Chicago neighborhoods , General public , General public of Chicago , General public of the United States , Epistemic integrity et Judicial integrity.
Système d'IA présumé impliqué: ChatGPT
Statistiques d'incidents
ID
1299
Nombre de rapports
1
Date de l'incident
2025-10-03
Editeurs
Daniel Atherton
Rapports d'incidents
Chronologie du rapport
Loading...
Les images de près de quarante-huit caméras corporelles portées par des agents de l'immigration lors de l'opération Midway Blitz ont été rendues publiques mercredi. Ces vidéos, filmées en caméra subjective et tremblante, témoignent du chaos…
Variantes
Une "Variante" est un incident de l'IA similaire à un cas connu—il a les mêmes causes, les mêmes dommages et le même système intelligent. Plutôt que de l'énumérer séparément, nous l'incluons sous le premier incident signalé. Contrairement aux autres incidents, les variantes n'ont pas besoin d'avoir été signalées en dehors de la base de données des incidents. En savoir plus sur le document de recherche.
Vous avez vu quelque chose de similaire ?