Entidades
Ver todas las entidadesEstadísticas de incidentes
Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv1_Annotator-1
Detalles de la TaxonomíaIncident Number
642
Notes (special interest intangible harm)
4.4 - The temporary glitch caused ChatGPT to output nonsensical/gibberish content, but it was not necessarily detrimental.
Special Interest Intangible Harm
no
Date of Incident Year
2024
Date of Incident Month
02
Date of Incident Day
20
Informes del Incidente
Cronología de Informes
- Ver el informe original en su fuente
- Ver el informe en el Archivo de Internet
ChatGPT, the widely used generative AI platform, has sparked concern and confusion among users today as it appears to be generating unexpected and nonsensical responses. OpenAI, the organisation behind ChatGPT, has announced that it is curr…
- Ver el informe original en su fuente
- Ver el informe en el Archivo de Internet
- Ver el informe original en su fuente
- Ver el informe en el Archivo de Internet
While it's generally understood that generative AI models are prone to hallucinating—that is, making up facts and other information in defiance of reality—OpenAI’s flagship ChatGPT suffered from a particularly widespread bout of largely amu…
- Ver el informe original en su fuente
- Ver el informe en el Archivo de Internet
ChatGPT users were baffled after the chatbot began churning out completely nonsensical responses on Tuesday night—or at least, more nonsense than usual. The issue was so bad that it forced OpenAI to begin investigating the “unexpected respo…
- Ver el informe original en su fuente
- Ver el informe en el Archivo de Internet
All those strange queries and poems about dogs might have finally caught up to the world's most popular AI chatbot, as users are reporting some seriously erratic behavior from ChatGPT.
ChatGPT and the dozens of generative AI platforms that …
Variantes
Incidentes Similares
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
Incidentes Similares
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents