Registro de citas para el Incidente 21

Description: The 2016 Winograd Schema Challenge highlighted how even the most successful AI systems entered into the Challenge were only successful 3% more often than random chance. This incident has been downgraded to an issue as it does not meet current ingestion criteria.

Herramientas

Nuevo InformeNuevo InformeNueva RespuestaNueva RespuestaDescubrirDescubrirVer HistorialVer Historial
Presunto: un sistema de IA desarrollado e implementado por Researchers, perjudicó a Researchers.

Estadísticas de incidentes

ID
21
Cantidad de informes
1
Fecha del Incidente
2016-07-14
Editores
Sean McGregor

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv0

Detalles de la Taxonomía

Full Description

The Winograd Schema Challenge in 2016 highlighted shortcomings of an artificially intelligent system's ability to understand context. The Challenge is designed to present ambiguous sentences and ask AI systems to decipher them. In the Winograd Scheme Challenge, the two winning entries were successful 48% of the time, while random chance was correct 45% of the time. Quan Liu of the University of Science and Technology of China (partnering with University of Toronto and National Research Council of Canada) and Nicos Isaak of the Open University of Cyprus presented the most successful systems. It is notable that Google and Facebook did not participate.

Short Description

The 2016 Winograd Schema Challenge highlighted how even the most successful AI systems entered into the Challenge were only successful 3% more often than random chance.

Severity

Unclear/unknown

AI System Description

Artificially intelligent systems meant to understand ambiguous English sentences.

Sector of Deployment

Professional, scientific and technical activities

Relevant AI functions

Perception, Cognition, Action

Location

New York, NY

Named Entities

Winograd Schema Challenge, University of Science and Technology of China, Quan Liu, University of Toronto, National Research Council of Canada, Nicos Isaak, Open University of Cyprus

Technology Purveyor

Quan Liu, Nicos Isaak

Beginning Date

2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Ending Date

2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Near Miss

Unclear/unknown

Intent

Unclear

Lives Lost

No

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía GMF

Detalles de la Taxonomía

Known AI Goal

Question Answering

Known AI Technology

Language Modeling, Distributional Learning

Potential AI Technology

Transformer

Potential AI Technical Failure

Generalization Failure, Dataset Imbalance, Underfitting, Context Misidentification

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía CSETv1

Detalles de la Taxonomía

Informes del Incidente

Base de datos de incidentes de AI Incidentes convertidos en problemas
github.com · 2022

Los siguientes incidentes anteriores se han convertido a "problemas" luego de una actualización de definición de incidentes y criterios de ingestión.

21: Una prueba de Turing más dura expone la estupidez de los chatbots

Descripción: El Wino…

Variantes

Una "Variante" es un incidente que comparte los mismos factores causales, produce daños similares e involucra los mismos sistemas inteligentes que un incidente de IA conocido. En lugar de indexar las variantes como incidentes completamente separados, enumeramos las variaciones de los incidentes bajo el primer incidente similar enviado a la base de datos. A diferencia de otros tipos de envío a la base de datos de incidentes, no se requiere que las variantes tengan informes como evidencia externa a la base de datos de incidentes. Obtenga más información del trabajo de investigación.