インシデントのステータス
CSETv1 分類法のクラス
分類法の詳細Incident Number
100
AI Tangible Harm Level Notes
No financial harm because the money was given back
AI was not involved in the robo-debt algorithms. Statistics and risk categories were used instead of AI.
Special Interest Intangible Harm
yes
Date of Incident Year
2021
CSETv1_Annotator-1 分類法のクラス
分類法の詳細Incident Number
100
AI Tangible Harm Level Notes
3.2 - It is unclear whether there was AI involved in the robo-debt algorithms.
Notes (special interest intangible harm)
4.6 - Welfare determination algorithms only affect citizens using welfare services, who may have less financial means.
Special Interest Intangible Harm
no
Date of Incident Year
2020
Estimated Date
Yes
CSETv1_Annotator-3 分類法のクラス
分類法の詳細Incident Number
100
AI Tangible Harm Level Notes
No financial harm because the money was given back
Special Interest Intangible Harm
no
Date of Incident Year
2021
Date of Incident Month
March
Date of Incident Day
17
インシデントレポート
レポートタイムライン
- 情報源として元のレポートを表示
- インターネットアーカイブでレポートを表示
I live alone and, like many of my generation, I am part of the precariat. As such, I receive several social benefits. The welfare office pays part of my rent and gives me a monthly stipend, which totals about 500€ a month. I’ve been working…
バリアント
よく似たインシデント
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
よく似たインシデント
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents