Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar

Incidente 653: Two Investment Firms Charged with Making False Claims of Artificial Intelligence Capabilities in Case of AI Washing

Respondido
Descripción: In a case of AI washing, the SEC charged two investment advisers, Delphia and Global Predictions, for falsely stating their use of artificial intelligence in their investment strategies between 2019 and 2023. Their misleading claims resulted in a settlement whereby the firms agreed to pay a total of $400,000 in penalties, highlighting the critical consequences of misrepresenting AI capabilities on investment decisions and trust.

Herramientas

Nuevo InformeNuevo InformeNueva RespuestaNueva RespuestaDescubrirDescubrirVer HistorialVer Historial

Entidades

Ver todas las entidades
Presunto: un sistema de IA desarrollado e implementado por Global Predictions Inc. y Delphia (USA) Inc., perjudicó a Investors.

Estadísticas de incidentes

ID
653
Cantidad de informes
1
Fecha del Incidente
2019-01-01
Editores
Daniel Atherton
Applied Taxonomies
MIT

Clasificaciones de la Taxonomía MIT

Machine-Classified
Detalles de la Taxonomía

Risk Subdomain

A further 23 subdomains create an accessible and understandable classification of hazards and harms associated with AI
 

3.1. False or misleading information

Risk Domain

The Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains: (1) Discrimination & toxicity, (2) Privacy & security, (3) Misinformation, (4) Malicious actors & misuse, (5) Human-computer interaction, (6) Socioeconomic & environmental harms, and (7) AI system safety, failures & limitations.
 
  1. Misinformation

Entity

Which, if any, entity is presented as the main cause of the risk
 

Human

Timing

The stage in the AI lifecycle at which the risk is presented as occurring
 

Post-deployment

Intent

Whether the risk is presented as occurring as an expected or unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
 

Intentional

Informes del Incidente

Cronología de Informes

Incident OccurrenceSEC Charges Two Investment Advisers with Making False and Misleading Statements About Their Use of Artificial Intelligence - Respuesta
SEC Charges Two Investment Advisers with Making False and Misleading Statements About Their Use of Artificial Intelligence

SEC Charges Two Investment Advisers with Making False and Misleading Statements About Their Use of Artificial Intelligence

sec.gov

SEC Charges Two Investment Advisers with Making False and Misleading Statements About Their Use of Artificial Intelligence
sec.gov · 2024
Respuesta post-incidente de Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington D.C., March 18, 2024 --- The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced settled charges against two investment advisers, Delphia (USA) Inc. and Global Predictions Inc., for making false and misleading statements about the…

Variantes

Una "Variante" es un incidente que comparte los mismos factores causales, produce daños similares e involucra los mismos sistemas inteligentes que un incidente de IA conocido. En lugar de indexar las variantes como incidentes completamente separados, enumeramos las variaciones de los incidentes bajo el primer incidente similar enviado a la base de datos. A diferencia de otros tipos de envío a la base de datos de incidentes, no se requiere que las variantes tengan informes como evidencia externa a la base de datos de incidentes. Obtenga más información del trabajo de investigación.

Incidentes Similares

Por similitud de texto

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

2010 Market Flash Crash

2010 Flash Crash

May 2010 · 30 informes
Defamation via AutoComplete

Algorithmic Defamation: The Case of the Shameless Autocomplete

Apr 2011 · 28 informes
COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

A Popular Algorithm Is No Better at Predicting Crimes Than Random People

May 2016 · 22 informes
Incidente AnteriorSiguiente Incidente

Incidentes Similares

Por similitud de texto

Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents

2010 Market Flash Crash

2010 Flash Crash

May 2010 · 30 informes
Defamation via AutoComplete

Algorithmic Defamation: The Case of the Shameless Autocomplete

Apr 2011 · 28 informes
COMPAS Algorithm Performs Poorly in Crime Recidivism Prediction

A Popular Algorithm Is No Better at Predicting Crimes Than Random People

May 2016 · 22 informes

Investigación

  • Definición de un “Incidente de IA”
  • Definición de una “Respuesta a incidentes de IA”
  • Hoja de ruta de la base de datos
  • Trabajo relacionado
  • Descargar Base de Datos Completa

Proyecto y Comunidad

  • Acerca de
  • Contactar y Seguir
  • Aplicaciones y resúmenes
  • Guía del editor

Incidencias

  • Todos los incidentes en forma de lista
  • Incidentes marcados
  • Cola de envío
  • Vista de clasificaciones
  • Taxonomías

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • Condiciones de uso
  • Política de privacidad
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • ecd56df