Descripción: Sullivan & Cromwell reportedly filed an emergency motion in the Chapter 15 bankruptcy case of Prince Global Holdings that contained numerous citation and legal inaccuracies. The firm later acknowledged that some errors were AI hallucinations and that its AI-use and citation-review policies had not been followed. After opposing counsel identified the problems, the firm reportedly undertook a formal remedial response.
Editor Notes: https://websitedc.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/In_re_Prince_USA_18_April_2026.pdf
Entidades
Ver todas las entidadesAlleged: Generative AI developers developed an AI system deployed by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP , Andrew G. Dietderich , Law firms y Lawyers, which harmed United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York , Boies Schiller Flexner LLP , Clients of lawyers , Insolvency practitioners , Court-appointed liquidators y Parties in In re Prince Global Holdings Limited.
Sistemas de IA presuntamente implicados: Sullivan & Cromwell AI-assisted legal drafting workflow , AI-assisted legal drafting systems y Generative AI systems
Estadísticas de incidentes
ID
1558
Cantidad de informes
1
Fecha del Incidente
2026-04-09
Editores
Daniel Atherton
Informes del Incidente
Cronología de Informes
Loading...
April 21 (Reuters) - Sullivan & Cromwell, a premier Wall Street law firm, apologized to a federal judge for submitting a court filing with inaccurate citations and other errors generated by artificial intelligence.
In a letter dated April …
Variantes
Una "Variante" es un incidente de IA similar a un caso conocido—tiene los mismos causantes, daños y sistema de IA. En lugar de enumerarlo por separado, lo agrupamos bajo el primer incidente informado. A diferencia de otros incidentes, las variantes no necesitan haber sido informadas fuera de la AIID. Obtenga más información del trabajo de investigación.
¿Has visto algo similar?
Incidentes Similares
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents
Incidentes Similares
Did our AI mess up? Flag the unrelated incidents