Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる

レポート 95

関連インシデント

インシデント 1624 Report
Images of Black People Labeled as Gorillas

Google Removed Gorillas From Search to Fix Racist Algorithm
nymag.com · 2018

It’s been over two years since engineer Jacky Alciné called out Google Photos for auto-tagging black people in his photos as “gorillas.” After being called out, Google promptly and profusely apologized, promising it’d fix the problems in the algorithm. “Lots of work being done, and lots still to be done,” tweeted Yonatan Zunger, chief architect of social at Google, according to CNET. “We’re very much on it.” It’s 2018, and it appears “on it” just meant a shoddy work-around that involved blocking all things the algorithm identified as “gorilla” from being tagged, just in case the algorithm opted to tag a black person again.

Google Photos, y'all fucked up. My friend's not a gorilla. pic.twitter.com/SMkMCsNVX4 — jackyalciné is about 40% into the IndieWeb. (@jackyalcine) June 29, 2015

Wired uncovered the “fix” in a series of tests using 40,000 images containing animals and running them through Google Photos. “It [Google Photos] performed impressively at finding many creatures, including pandas and poodles,” the magazine reports. “But the service reported ‘no results’ for the search terms ‘gorilla,’ ‘chimp,’ ‘chimpanzee,’ and ‘monkey.’” The program was able to find some primates, including baboons, gibbons, and marmosets. Capuchin and colobus monkeys were also identified correctly, so long as the word monkey wasn’t included in the search. Searches for “black man” and “black woman” turned up photos of people of the chosen gender in black and white, rather than of a given race.

A Google spokesperson confirmed to Wired that several primate terms, including “gorilla,” are still blocked following the 2015 incident. “Image labeling technology is still early and unfortunately it’s nowhere near perfect,” the spokesperson said. It’s unclear if image-labeling tech is just “still early” — it’s been several years, you’d think Google could have figured some things out in that time — or if Google is just being careful to avoid being called racist, again. Alternatively, properly fixing Google Photos simply isn’t worth the money and the time to Google. It’s easier to slap a Band-Aid on it and pretend that gorillas — and much worse, black people — don’t exist in its photos.

情報源を読む

リサーチ

  • “AIインシデント”の定義
  • “AIインシデントレスポンス”の定義
  • データベースのロードマップ
  • 関連研究
  • 全データベースのダウンロード

プロジェクトとコミュニティ

  • AIIDについて
  • コンタクトとフォロー
  • アプリと要約
  • エディタのためのガイド

インシデント

  • 全インシデントの一覧
  • フラグの立ったインシデント
  • 登録待ち一覧
  • クラスごとの表示
  • 分類法

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • 利用規約
  • プライバシーポリシー
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • d414e0f