Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる

レポート 766

関連インシデント

インシデント 441 Report
Machine Personal Assistants Failed to Maintain Social Norms

Loading...
Electric Elves: What Went Wrong and Why
aaai.org · 2008

Abstract: Software personal assistants continue to be a topic of significant research interest. This article outlines some of the important lessons learned from a successfully deployed team of personal assistant agents (Electric Elves) in an office environment. In the Electric Elves project, a team of almost a dozen personal assistant agents were continually active for seven months. Each elf (agent) represented one person and assisted in daily activities in an actual office environment. This project led to several important observations about privacy, adjustable autonomy, and social norms in office environments. In addition to outlining some of the key lessons learned we outline our continued research to address some of the concerns raised.

The topic of software personal assistants, particularly for office environments, is of continued and growing research interest (Scerri, Pynadath, and Tambe 2002; Maheswaran et al. 2004; Modi and Veloso 2005; Pynadath and Tambe 2003). The goal is to provide software agent assistants for individuals in an office as well as software agents that represent shared office resources. The resulting set of agents coordinate as a team to facilitate routine office activities. This article outlines some key lessons learned during the successful deployment of a team of a dozen agents, called Electric Elves (EElves), which ran continually from June 2000 to December 2000 at the Information Sciences Institute (ISI) at the University of Southern California (USC) (Scerri, Pynadath, and Tambe 2002; Chalupsky et al. 2002; Pynadath and Tambe 2003, 2001; Pynadath et al. 2000). Each elf (agent) acted as an assistant to one person and aided in the daily activities of an actual office environment. Originally, the E-Elves project was designed to focus on team coordination among software agents. However, while team coordination remained an interesting challenge, several other unanticipated research issues came to the fore. Among these new issues were adjustable autonomy (agents dynamically adjusting their own level of autonomy), as well as privacy and social norms in office environments. Several earlier publications outline the primary technical contributions of E-Elves and research inspired by E-Elves in detail. However, the goal of this article is to highlight some of what went wrong in the E-Elves project and provide a broad overview of technical advances in the areas of concern without providing specific technical details.

情報源を読む

リサーチ

  • “AIインシデント”の定義
  • “AIインシデントレスポンス”の定義
  • データベースのロードマップ
  • 関連研究
  • 全データベースのダウンロード

プロジェクトとコミュニティ

  • AIIDについて
  • コンタクトとフォロー
  • アプリと要約
  • エディタのためのガイド

インシデント

  • 全インシデントの一覧
  • フラグの立ったインシデント
  • 登録待ち一覧
  • クラスごとの表示
  • 分類法

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • 利用規約
  • プライバシーポリシー
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • e1b50cd