Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる

レポート 2365

関連インシデント

インシデント 43021 Report
Lawyers Denied Entry to Performance Venue by Facial Recognition

Loading...
Madison Square Garden's Parent Company Used Facial Recognition Tech To Eject Lawyers Suing Them From Shows
metalinjection.net · 2022

Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSG Entertainment) is using facial recognition technology to eject lawyers suing them from shows. According to a report by Rolling Stone, MSG Entertainment, who owns Madison Square Garden as well as Radio City Music Hall and the Beacon Theatre, ejected lawyer Barbara Hart and her husband from a Brandi Carlile show on October 22. Hart is an attorney at Grant & Eisenhofer, who is currently suing MSG Entertainment as part of a class action lawsuit.

"There's a wealth of possibility to use technology to the betterment of our society," said Hart to Rolling Stone. "But my real feeling here is that this case is demonstrative of the abuse of technology, akin to what we see with Elon Musk kicking people off of Twitter just because they can."

A similar situation happened to Kelly Conlon, an associate at a firm suing MSG Entertainment, as she was thrown out of a Radio City Rockettes show at Radio City Music Hall she was attending with her daughter and Girl Scout Troop.

But surely this can't just be the new dystopian hell we live in, right? They're not actually using facial recognition technology to toss anyone opposing them from shows, right? Unfortunately MSG Entertainment provided a statement to Rolling Stone confirming that is exactly the case.

"MSG instituted a straightforward policy that precludes attorneys from firms pursuing active litigation against the Company from attending events at our venues until that litigation has been resolved. While we understand this policy is disappointing to some, we cannot ignore the fact that litigation creates an inherently adversarial environment."

The only word that comes to mind here is definitely "dystopian." That someone who was hired to do a job gets tossed from a show they paid to go to because the company they're suing has decided they shouldn't be there, and used facial recognition technology to identify them. Woof.

情報源を読む

リサーチ

  • “AIインシデント”の定義
  • “AIインシデントレスポンス”の定義
  • データベースのロードマップ
  • 関連研究
  • 全データベースのダウンロード

プロジェクトとコミュニティ

  • AIIDについて
  • コンタクトとフォロー
  • アプリと要約
  • エディタのためのガイド

インシデント

  • 全インシデントの一覧
  • フラグの立ったインシデント
  • 登録待ち一覧
  • クラスごとの表示
  • 分類法

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • 利用規約
  • プライバシーポリシー
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • e1b50cd