Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる
発見する
投稿する
  • ようこそAIIDへ
  • インシデントを発見
  • 空間ビュー
  • テーブル表示
  • リスト表示
  • 組織
  • 分類法
  • インシデントレポートを投稿
  • 投稿ランキング
  • ブログ
  • AIニュースダイジェスト
  • リスクチェックリスト
  • おまかせ表示
  • サインアップ
閉じる

レポート 2054

関連インシデント

インシデント 3415 Report
Nissan's "Automatic Emergency Braking" False Positives Posed Traffic Risks to Drivers

Loading...
Forward Emergency Braking: Nissan’s First Class Action Lawsuit
knightlawgroup.com · 2021

Several Nissan models may come with a safety system called “Forward Emergency Braking” or “Automatic Emergency Braking,” which is designed to detect obstacles such as cars and pedestrians. When it detects an obstacle, it is supposed to give a warning to the driver, and if the driver does not respond in time, the system is supposed to trigger the brakes, saving the driver from an otherwise dangerous crash.

However, a class action lawsuit filed in 2018 alleged that the “Forward Emergency Braking” (FEB) system is inherently defective. Drivers of some 2015–Present Nissan vehicles claim that the FEB systems detect non-existent obstacles and, upon detection of objects that are not actually present, trigger the brakes. This brake activation will appear at random, and can occur in unsafe situations, such as the middle of an intersection.

The FEB system allegedly is also prone to suddenly shutting off. When this happens, the following warning appears on the dashboard: “Front radar unavailable due to obstruction.”

The lawsuit affects the following vehicles:

  • 2015–Present Nissan Rogue
  • 2015–Present Nissan Rogue Sport
  • 2015–Present Nissan Murano
  • 2015–Present Nissan Altima
  • 2015–Present Nissan Maxima
  • 2015–Present Nissan Armada
  • 2015–Present Nissan Pathfinder
  • 2015–Present Nissan Leaf
  • 2015–Present Nissan Sentra
  • Other 2015–Present Nissan vehicles with the FEB defect

The effects of this alleged defect include the feature suddenly becoming inoperable, sudden stops and sudden slow-downs, even as the vehicle drives into oncoming traffic.

Despite the alleged presence of the FEB defect, Nissan allegedly did not issue a recall or offer a suitable repair or free replacement at the time the lawsuit was filed. Not only that, Nissan allegedly knew about the defects well in advance, thanks to means not accessible to consumers. These means include pre-production testing, consumer complaints to the manufacturer, warranty data and dealership repair orders.

Drivers with the vehicles listed in the complaint may find themselves automatically included in the class action lawsuit. If this class action lawsuit is certified to proceed, those who purchased these vehicles may need to opt out by certain deadlines in order to pursue an individual lemon law case.

The California Lemon Law allows owners and lessees of defective vehicles to receive one of three rewards from an automaker: cash compensation, vehicle replacement or lemon law buyback. However, it is difficult for such drivers to get these rewards without the help of a California lemon law attorney.

If you suspect that your Nissan vehicle is equipped with a faulty autonomous braking system, fill out the form below or call Knight Law Group at 877-222-2222 for a free lemon law consultation.

情報源を読む

リサーチ

  • “AIインシデント”の定義
  • “AIインシデントレスポンス”の定義
  • データベースのロードマップ
  • 関連研究
  • 全データベースのダウンロード

プロジェクトとコミュニティ

  • AIIDについて
  • コンタクトとフォロー
  • アプリと要約
  • エディタのためのガイド

インシデント

  • 全インシデントの一覧
  • フラグの立ったインシデント
  • 登録待ち一覧
  • クラスごとの表示
  • 分類法

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • 利用規約
  • プライバシーポリシー
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • e1b50cd