Skip to Content
logologo
AI Incident Database
Open TwitterOpen RSS FeedOpen FacebookOpen LinkedInOpen GitHub
Open Menu
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar
Descubrir
Enviar
  • Bienvenido a la AIID
  • Descubrir Incidentes
  • Vista espacial
  • Vista Tabular
  • Vista de lista
  • Entidades
  • Taxonomías
  • Enviar Informes de Incidentes
  • Ranking de Reportadores
  • Blog
  • Resumen de noticias de IA
  • Control de Riesgos
  • Incidente aleatorio
  • Registrarse
Colapsar
Entidades

Legal integrity

Afectado por Incidentes

Incidente 10992 Reportes
Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

2025-04-25

In Ko v. Li, 2025 ONSC 2766, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice identified multiple inaccurate or nonexistent case citations in a factum submitted by counsel for the applicant. Justice FL Myers questioned whether generative AI was used in drafting the document, noting the cited cases were either irrelevant, misrepresented, or did not exist. The court ordered the lawyer to show cause why she should not be cited for contempt, citing duties of accuracy and technological competence.

Más

Incidente 10271 Reporte
Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

2025-04-10

In early 2025, Norway’s Supreme Court (Høyesterett) received a legal filing containing hallucinated legal citations and quotes, allegedly inserted by an attorney using an AI tool without verification. The fabricated sources were detected during standard review. While no sanctions were issued, the Court updated its guidance to lawyers, warning that AI use does not exempt them from professional responsibility.

Más

Incidente 11381 Reporte
Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

2023-03-01

In a defamation case at the Johannesburg Regional Court, Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys, representing plaintiff Michelle Parker, reportedly relied on purportedly non-existent legal judgments generated by ChatGPT to help argue their case. Magistrate Arvin Chaitram reportedly found the case names and citations were fictitious, causing a two-month delay. The court issued a punitive costs order and rebuked the plaintiff's legal team for uncritically accepting AI-generated research.

Más

Entidades relacionadas
Otras entidades que están relacionadas con el mismo incidente. Por ejemplo, si el desarrollador de un incidente es esta entidad pero el implementador es otra entidad, se marcan como entidades relacionadas.
 

Entity

Unnamed Norwegian lawyer

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incidente 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Más
Entity

Unspecified generative AI developer

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incidente 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Más
Entity

Supreme Court of Norway

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Más
Entity

Høyesterett

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Más
Entity

Unnamed clients represented by unnamed Norwegian lawyer

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Más
Entity

Unnamed generative AI system

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incidente 1027
    1 Report

    Norwegian Supreme Court Receives Legal Filing with Fabricated Citations Allegedly Generated by AI Tool

Más
Entity

Jisuh Lee

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incidente 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Más
Entity

Unspecified large language mode developer

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incidente 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Más
Entity

Hanna Ko

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Más
Entity

Ontario Superior Court of Justice

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Más
Entity

Unspecified large language model

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incidente 1099
    2 Report

    Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

Más
Entity

Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Más
Entity

Jurie Hayes

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Más
Entity

Chantal Rodrigues

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Incidents involved as Deployer
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Más
Entity

OpenAI

Incidents involved as Developer
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Más
Entity

Michelle Parker

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Más
Entity

Judicial integrity

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Más
Entity

Epistemic integrity

Afectado por Incidentes
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Más
Entity

ChatGPT

Incidents implicated systems
  • Incidente 1138
    1 Report

    Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys Reportedly Relied on Unverified ChatGPT Case Law in Johannesburg Body Corporate Defamation Matter

Más

Investigación

  • Definición de un “Incidente de IA”
  • Definición de una “Respuesta a incidentes de IA”
  • Hoja de ruta de la base de datos
  • Trabajo relacionado
  • Descargar Base de Datos Completa

Proyecto y Comunidad

  • Acerca de
  • Contactar y Seguir
  • Aplicaciones y resúmenes
  • Guía del editor

Incidencias

  • Todos los incidentes en forma de lista
  • Incidentes marcados
  • Cola de envío
  • Vista de clasificaciones
  • Taxonomías

2024 - AI Incident Database

  • Condiciones de uso
  • Política de privacidad
  • Open twitterOpen githubOpen rssOpen facebookOpen linkedin
  • 818b77a